The next system, possibilities for the 21st century

By februari 20, 2016 Algemeen

Confronted with mounting social, economic, and ecological crises, growing numbers of people have begun to realize that traditional strategies and reformist approaches no longer work. Simply put, many understand that addressing the problems of the twenty-first century requires going beyond business as usual. It requires ‘changing the system.’ But what does this mean? And what would it entail?

A systemic crisis, not simply political and economic difficulties. The economy is stagnating. The political system is stalemated. Communities are in decay. The lives of millions are compromised by economic and social pain. Violence is endemic among individuals, communities, and nations.

Civil liberties are eroding. Near-record numbers of citizens remain incarcerated. Underemployment, inequality, and ecological despoliation deepen day by day. The planet itself is threatened by climate change. A generation of young people expects to be worse off than their parents. The very idea of building a cooperative community of caring responsibility has faded from common understanding. Traditional strategies to achieve equitable and sustainable social, economic, and ecological outcomes   simply no longer work. Income and wealth disparities have become severe.

The time has come to think boldly about what is required to deal with the systemic difficulties facing us. It is time to begin a real conversation—locally, nationally, and at all levels—about genuine alternatives. It is time to develop thoughtful, system-building answers to system-threatening challenges. It is time to debate what it will really take to move in a new direction capable of producing sustainable, lasting, and more democratic social, economic, and ecological outcomes.

Unbeknownst to many, literally thousands of on the-ground efforts have been developing. There are thousands of cooperatives, worker-owned companies, neighborhood corporations, and many little-known municipal, state, and regional efforts. Most of the projects, ideas, and research efforts have gained traction slowly and with little national attention. But in the wake of the financial crisis, they have proliferated and earned a surprising amount of support—and not only among advocates on the left. The various institutional efforts have begun to develop new strategies that point to broader possibilities for change.

Thus we encounter the sharing economy, the caring economy, the provisioning economy, the restorative economy, the regenerative economy, he sustaining economy, the collaborative economy, the solidarity economy, the gift economy, the resilient economy, the steady state economy, the new economy, and many more. Several of these approaches already have significant constituencies and work underway. Creative strategic thinking is also contributing to the ferment, and policies at the state and local level can help move projects into much more powerful scale and community-wide impact. Larger scale strategic options that build on what is being learned locally are beginning to be sketched for longer-term national strategies.

Given pressing ecological limits and the need to restore ‘human scale’to the economy, a number of writers and organizations have argued for an economic model based around a small-scale, decentralized, ecologically-oriented sector of entrepreneurial individuals, small businesses, and households. These approaches also emphasize trading off consumption against increased free time and sociability, and are rooted in healthy, resilient local communities that are capable of sustaining high degrees of trust, reciprocity, and mutualism. A proper system design goal is an economy that maintains ecological balance between aggregate human consumption and the regenerative capacity of the biosphere while maintaining an equitable distribution of real wealth and supporting deep democracy. Guided by living system principles, the global human economy should thus be restructured around largely self-reliant bioregional economies in which decision-making is predominantly local and each bioregional economy seeks to live within the means of the bioregional ecosystem. Higher system levels will be structured around the principle of subsidiary and be supportive of predominantly local decision-making. A publicly-traded, limited-liability corporation as an extractive enterprise form antithetical to these values and principles, and seeks to replace it with ‘living enterprise’ forms as the basic business unit of the new economy.

New bioregional approaches oriented to local ecologically sustainable regionally based development have emerged over the last several decades. Bioregionalism consciously links environmental and sustainability issues with thinking about political economic relationships and systems. Bioregionalism is working to satisfy basic needs locally, such as education, health care and self-governance.

The bioregional perspective recreates a widely-shared sense of regional identity founded upon a renewed critical awareness of and respect for the integrity of our ecological communities.